Photo: REX Shutterstock.
With talk of whether Obama will nominate a new Supreme Court Justice during the last year of his term, Republicans have already announced they will block any nomination coming from him.
"I believe that the president should not move forward and I think we ought to let the next president [decide]...with a vote by the people of the United States of America," John Kasich said, after expressing hopes that Obama will "pick someone who will have unanimous approval."
Scalia, who most recently is known for penning the dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court cases on Obamacare and same-sex marriage, was also applauded by Cruz for being someone who "was faithful to the Constitution. He changed the arc of American legal history."
In an opposition to the Supreme Court's Obamacare decision, Scalia wrote, "The Court's decision reflects the philosophy that judges should endure whatever interpretive distortions it takes in order to correct a supposed flaw in the statutory machinery. That philosophy ignores the American people's decision to give Congress '[a]ll legislative Powers' enumerated in the Constitution."
And in his widely quoted opposition to SCOTUS' approval of same-sex marriage, Scalia wrote:"Ask the nearest hippie. Expression, sure enough, is a freedom, but anyone in a long-lasting marriage will attest that that happy state constricts, rather than expands, what one can prudently say."
Obama announced prior to the debate that he will be naming a nominee, who must go through the Senate to be approved.
"I plan to fulfill my constitutional responsibilities to nominate a successor in due time,” Obama said. “There’s plenty of time...for the Senate to fulfill its responsibility to give that person a fair hearing and a timely vote. These are responsibilities I take seriously, as should everyone.”
Of course, any candidate nominated must be approved by the Senate, a process that can take as long as three months, as seen in the case of Clarence Thomas. "It’s been standard practice over the last 80 years to not confirm Supreme Court nominees during a presidential election year," Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said today. It is, however, the President of the United States' constitutional right to nominate a SCOTUS replacement and the Senate's job to fill that seat.
Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?
Kendall Jenner Announced A Makeup Launch, Plus More Must- Read Stories
It's Official: The Obamas Are Going To Cuba, Plus More Must-Read Stories
What The Republican Candidates Said At South Carolina Town Halls